Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
While Muslim migration has been extensively studied within European contexts, the recent surge of Muslim immigrants entering the United States remains under-theorized. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 31 Muslim immigrants in Chicago, this study investigates how modes of entry and legal status intersect with duration of residence to shape ethnic identity construction. Challenging linear assimilation models that prioritize time as the primary vehicle for integration, this research identifies a tripartite division within the diaspora: the "Old Guard" (Pre-2010), the "Bridge Cohort" (2010–2019), and the "New Wave" (Post-2020).
Utilizing frameworks of Segmented Assimilation and Boundary Making, the data reveals that legal classification serves as a master status defining integration outcomes. The Pre-2010 cohort, secure in U.S. citizenship, exhibits "optional ethnicity," treating their identity as symbolic heritage while achieving high structural assimilation. The Bridge Cohort, arriving via legal pathways, leveraged their status to strategically pivot into the IT sector, emerging as the community’s "conscious" gatekeepers.
Crucially, the Post-2020 cohort bifurcates sharply based on mode of entry. While visa holders maintain professional continuity, asylum seekers arriving via the U.S.–Mexico border experience profound "status inconsistency." This latter group adopts a "reactive identity," constructing rigid boundaries against their state of origin and relying on various cultural and religious centers for survival rather than simply for nostalgia. These findings illustrate how the legal infrastructure of immigration creates deep class fissures within ethnic communities, complicating the narrative of a monolithic immigrant experience in the contemporary United States.