Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
This paper examines the evolving role of human labor in the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), tracing a transition from invisible “ghost workers” performing simple, low-wage microwork to a new class of “platformized experts”. As large language models (LLMs) approach a “data wall” - having already consumed much of the high-quality data available for scraping - AI labs increasingly rely on domain-specific judgment for tasks such as evaluation, safety, and alignment. Building on scholarship on microwork, human-in-the-loop systems, and data colonialism, the paper argues that AI supply chains are being re-stratified rather than “automated away”. Empirically, it draws on a case study of Mercor, a platform intermediary that brokers short-term, hourly contracts between AI labs and professionals (e.g., radiologists, lawyers, finance specialists, engineers, and multilingual consultants). Based on a snapshot analysis of 223 Mercor job postings (December 7, 2025), the paper shows that expert data work is often well compensated (average $74/hour), yet remains organized through contingent, platform-mediated relations that reproduce familiar vulnerabilities: opaque governance, uneven access to tasks, and regional pay disparities. The central paradox is that contemporary AI development simultaneously pursues the reduction of human involvement (e.g., through AI-mediated feedback) while intensifying dependence on human expertise to handle ambiguity, values, and accountability. As an extension of this analysis, I am currently conducting semi-structured interviews with domain experts (such as senior engineers, linguistic experts) who participate in this form of platform-mediated expert data work. These interviews examine how experts interpret their own role in the AI supply chain- whether they experience the work as automating their own jobs away, or as contributing to domain development, or as something more ambivalent?