Restorative Justice Conferencing Using Face-to-Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction

• In Event: Evidence-Based Crime Policy III

Abstract

This systematic review examines the effects of the subset of restorative justice programs that has been tested most extensively: a face-to-face restorative justice conference (RJC) that entail facilitated meetings between offenders, their victims, and their supporters, to discuss the harm caused by the crime and what should happen to repair the harm. The review investigates the effects of RJCs on offenders’ subsequent convictions (or in one case arrests) for crime, and on several measures of victim impact. It considers only randomized controlled trials in which victim and offenders consented to meet prior to random assignment, the analysis of which was based on the results of an “intention-to-treat” analysis. From 519 studies examined, a total of ten experiments with recidivism outcomes were found that met the eligibility criteria, all of which also had at least one victim impact measure. Our synthesis of these experiments shows that, on average, RJCs cause a modest but highly cost-effective reduction in repeat offending, with substantial benefits for victims. A cost-effectiveness estimate for the seven experiments in the United Kingdom found a ratio of 8 times more benefit in costs of crimes prevented than the cost of delivering RJCs.

Authors

• Heather Strang, Cambridge University

• Lawrence W. Sherman, Cambridge University / University of Maryland

• Evan Mayo-Wilson, Johns Hopkins University

• Daniel J. Woods, Police Foundation

• Barak Ariel, Cambridge University / Hebrew University