Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Understanding the potential deterrent effects of DUI sanctions is vital in constructing effective policies for preventing DUI offenses. Previous research has suggested that some sanctions (e.g., license suspension) can reduce rates of alcohol-impaired driving, however a number of studies fail to find deterrent effects for other types of punishment. Using a hypothetical drinking and driving scenario followed by a survey of perceived costs and benefits, the current study attempts to find evidence of specific deterrence effects, and also to evaluate the perceived costs of drunk driving among those who have and have not been previously punished for the offense. The study utilizes a sample of 1,103 felony offenders from institutions in a Southwestern state. Hypothetical likelihood of drunk driving is expected to be significantly lower among those who have previously been punished for this kind of behavior, controlling for other factors. Additionally, it is also hypothesized that these offenders will give higher ratings of the potential certainty (and possibly severity) of costs (especially legal costs) relative to other offenders. Results and policy implications will be discussed.
Jeff A. Bouffard, Sam Houston State University
M. Lyn Exum, University of North Carolina at Charlotte