Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
While a great deal of attention has been given to the crime drop of the 1990s (Crime Drop I), less is known about a second crime drop that occurred in the later part of the 2000s (Crime Drop II). Unlike the first one, the second crime drop is argued to be shorter in duration (approximately 2006-2011) and possibly limited to specific large U.S. cities (e.g., New York) and violent crimes. The goal of this paper is to explore the differences/similarities in Crime Drop I and Crime Drop II and to examine the role structural features and crime control strategies play in these two distinct longitudinal trends. Using homicide data on the large sample of U.S. cities from 1980 to 2011, we investigate the characteristics and causes of both crime drops. That is, after identifying the two longitudinal trends, we examine if structural predictors commonly used in homicide research (e.g., poverty, residential instability, population characteristics, percent Latino) or indicators of crime control strategies (police force size, incarceration rates) contribute to the two major temporal homicide trends in U.S. history.
Karen F. Parker, University of Delaware
Ashley Mancik, University of Delaware
Richard Stansfield, Rutgers University