Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper compares responses of democratic states to the unauthorised public disclosure of national security information. It is based on prominent cases occurring under five different liberal democratic regimes: France, Britain, Switzerland, Israel and the United States. Each case considers the disclosure in question, whether the information revealed was indicative of illegality on the part of the state, and the media through which it was disclosed. It then analyses the mobilization of law by the aggrieved government, including whether the state itself violated the law in the course of its response. Next, it looks at longer term legal and policy consequences of the matter in question. The concluding section addresses two fundamental questions: Was the information appropriately classified in the first place? What harm to national security resulted from the disclosures?