Examining the Effects of Juvenile Sex Offender Registration and Notification on Case Processing

• In Event: Advances in Sex Offender Policy Research: Policy Implementation and Impacts

Abstract

Since the 1990s, states have widely adopted sex offender registration and notification [SORN] legislation. The administration of SORN has varied by state, however. One important dimension in which states vary is whether to subject youth who have sexually offended to registration requirements. While some states have forgone juvenile registration, youth in other states may be subjected to lifetime registration as a sex offender. Some scholars have noted that this policy stands in contrast to the traditionally rehabilitative framework of the juvenile justice system, is unlikely to reduce recidivism, and may result in negative consequences for the registered youth. Few studies have examined the effect of juvenile SORN on court processing of these cases. Prior research from South Carolina suggests that juvenile SORN has led to an increase in dismissal, diversion, and plea-bargaining in juvenile sex offense cases in that state. This study contributes to this line of research by examining judicial processing of juveniles charged with sexual offenses in two different states: Maryland and Oregon. Results and directions for future research and policy will be addressed.

Authors

• Ryan Timothy Shields, Johns Hopkins University

• Elizabeth J. Letourneau, Johns Hopkins University

• Mark Chaffin, University of Oklahoma

• Donna M. Vandiver, Texas State University