Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Approaches to the study of electronic monitoring suffer from lack of attention to the role of interpretation in the construction of the “problems” and populations subjected to surveillance. Emphasis is given to the impact, proliferation, and ubiquity of technology-based systems, marginalizing the continued relevance of traditional approaches to supervision, especially inasmuch as surveillance is implemented through different styles of casework. Drawing from extant fieldwork-based research conducted with personnel using electronic monitoring in the UK, and a multi-site study of personnel utilizing GPS pre-trial in domestic violence cases in the US, a comparative analysis is offered to illustrate how community corrections may be differentially attuned to the role of interpretation in implementing surveillance technologies with “problem populations.” The importance of surveillance as a socially interactive process is highlighted and distinguished from ambient monitoring of environments with data banking technologies.
Peter Ibarra, University of Illinois at Chicago
Oren M. Gur, University of Illinois at Chicago
Edna Erez, University of Illinois at Chicago