Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In the aftermath of the financial meltdown of 2008, the governments of Iceland and the United States were confronted with the eminent failure of financial institutions, angry protest by citizens and a desire to prosecute individuals who were believed to be responsible for the financial crisis. Within a short period of time, the approach the two governments used diverged. The size of the countries and their economies alone do not explain the difference in how they pursued financial crime. This paper explores how regulators and prosecutors in each country chose to pursue alleged misconduct and crimes associated with the 2008 financial meltdown and hypothesizes why they chose their particular course of action.