Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
Building on the strong tradition of thorough evaluation of policy innovations, three papers examine key questions in how indigent defense services should be delivered. The papers examine the difference made to clients by decisions to provide counsel earlier in cases, to require attorneys to use checklists in their representation, and to provide representation through institutionalized, rather than contracted, attorney service-providers.
Using Checklists to Improve Advocacy - Jeff Adachi, San Francisco Public Defender Office
Providing Counsel at First Appearance in a Semi-Rural County - Kirstin Morgan, University at Albany, SUNY; Andrew L.B. Davies, University at Albany, SUNY / NYS Indigent Legal Services; Alissa Pollitz-Worden, University at Albany, SUNY
Kids, Counsel and Costs: An Empirical Study of Indigent Defense Services in the Los Angeles Juvenile Delinquency Courts - Cyn Yamashiro, Law Offices of Cyn Yamashiro; Tarek Azzam, Claremont Graduate University; Igor Himmelfarb, University of California, Santa Barbara
The Power of Checking Boxes: A Tool for Implementing and Evaluating Holistic Defense - Justine Olderman, The Bronx Defenders