Courtroom Workgroup Dynamics and the Implementation of Three Strikes Reform

• In Event: Court Communities and Work Group Dynamics

Abstract

This study analyzes data from interviews with prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges in eight California Counties. The analysis finds that the dynamics of the courtroom workgroup influence the implementation of sentencing policy and reform. A combination of internal and external factors shape the dynamics of the courtroom workgroup. These include the historical relationship between the participants and their offices. Workgroup members are more likely to cooperate if they know the other members well and trust them, and if they consider their relationships professional and friendly. This relationship is less stable if there is high turnover or less seniority among individuals assigned to carry out the implementation. Another factor is professional confidence. Workgroup members are more likely to cooperate if they perceive themselves to be well-respected, well-qualified, and highly experienced. Political insulation also matters. Workgroup members are more cooperative if they believe they are not susceptible to public backlash. This could be because they feel politically secure, with high enough support from the public that controversial decisions will not harm their reputation, or because the reform that they are implementing has high public support, so they feel that they are carrying out the public’s wishes, regardless of their own views.

Author

• Elsa Chen, Santa Clara University