Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
One of the major goals of any standardized risk and needs assessment instrument is to remove bias from the decision-making process. A number of factors, however, may influence practitioner perceptions and, ultimately, their support for the use of an actuarial-based instrument. There is a perception in the field that longer-tenured staff are more likely to be skeptical and/or less supportive of the use of such assessment instruments. This paper will explore responses from in-person, semi-structured interviews and web-based surveys of juvenile justice practitioners to assess support for the OYAS. Responses will be compared across experience level to examine possible differences in attitudes toward use of these tools and the use of overrides to extend discretion. Practice and policy implications for juvenile justice agencies will be identified.
Gina N. Gibbs, University of Cincinnati
Jennifer Lux, University of Cincinnati
Edward J. Latessa, University of Cincinnati