Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Staff that administer the OYAS may be in a position to observe how information from the instrument is used for a variety of decisions (e.g., case planning, treatment referrals, supervision length). They may also have more familiarity with the process by which the information that goes into the assessment score is obtained. This exposure to the day-to-day processes and usage of the OYAS may influence overall perceptions of the tool. Staff who are not involved in the day-to-day process of the administration, on the other hand, may be less supportive of the use of such assessments. This paper will compare end-users’ (i.e., those who administer the tools) levels of support for the use of the OYAS to those staff who do not administer it. To the extent that differences are found, we will use other aspects of the interviews and surveys to identify the possible reasons for this difference in support. Similarities and differences between the two groups will be identified and implications for juvenile justice policy and practices will be discussed.
Jennifer Lux, University of Cincinnati
Katelyn Cain, University of Cincinnati
Gina N. Gibbs, University of Cincinnati
Christopher Sullivan, University of Cincinnati
Edward J. Latessa, University of Cincinnati