Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Desistance research commonly involves longitudinal cohort studies, which tracks individuals over time. A key feature examined in these studies is the development and change of desistance over time. Little attention has been given to the spatial dynamics of desistance; how these processes vary between different places with different social, economic, and criminal justice conditions. In this paper, I introduce a comparative research that explores the spatial dynamics of desistance in England and Israel, aiming to fill our current gap in understanding. I discuss the findings of the first phase of this study, which interviewed professionals working with ex-offenders and analysed data from the European Social Survey. This work was undertaken in addition to the second phase, which interviews desisters. Particular attention is given to the social-structural conditions in each country, which possibly structure routes out of crime. A comparison of key social-structural mechanisms that can impact desistance processes are discussed. Namely, criminal justice policies, employment for people with convictions, familial characteristics, and social capital. I conclude with what can be learned from such a comparison and the implications for desistance research and theory.