Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Although environmental crime and green criminology research have increased in recent years, we have a limited understanding of environmental victimization from the perspective of the victims themselves. This paper analyzes victim testimony during the sentencing phase of a federal environmental crime case involving violations of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the United States v. CITGO. Prior to sentencing, close to 1,000 fenceline community members petitioned the court to be declared victims of CITGO’s crimes under the federal Crime Victim’s Rights Act (CVRA). The District Court granted the petitioners’ victim status after a long court battle involving an appeal to the Fifth Circuit years prior. In this paper, we utilize content analysis of five days of victims’ testimony from the sentencing phase of the case. Our analysis provides preliminary insight into how environmental victims perceive their victim status, power relationships in the community, and the role of government in allowing their victimization.
Melissa Jarrell, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi
Joshua Ozymy, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi