Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Despite numerous empirical examinations and theoretical explanations, persistent offending remains a contentious concept in criminology. There are debates in the field regarding the exact definition of persistence, as well as whether persistent criminals can be prospectively identified. This paper aims to contribute to this debate by proposing that persistent offending is characterised by a criminal career that spans multiple life stages while maintaining a rank ordering of persistence when compared to a representative sample. It is argued that this definition is applicable to a variety of measures, such as antisocial behaviour, self-reported offending, arrests, and incarcerations. It is further contended that there are varying degrees of persistence. Indeed, a persistent criminal career could span 40, 60, or 80 years. To accurately measure persistence, the duration of the criminal career needs to be analysed. Although variables such as frequency, severity, chronicity, and onset age are often used as measures of persistence, they fail to capture the defining feature of this phenomenon. Persistence is also argued to not be immutable to change, suggesting that intermittency, (de)escalation, and desistance from offending are all within the spectrum of a persistent criminal career.
Tyson Whitten, Griffith University
Tara Renae McGee, Griffith University
Ross Homel, Griffith University