Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study utilized the factorial survey design, a quasi-experimental approach, in an attempt to measure whether a respondent’s level of empathy affected death penalty support. Three hundred undergraduate students were presented with three vignettes in which defendants charged with murder were sentenced to death or facing the death penalty in situations where it was later discovered that evidence presented by a witness (neighbor, cellmate, or crime lab analyst) was unreliable or clearly false. The race and sex of the defendant, the victim, and the witness were randomly assigned. Respondents were asked to rate their feelings and to decide what should happen to the offender. Options included a range from outright release to sentence reduction to execution. Three forms of empathy measures were used, in addition to the feeling questions per vignette. In addition, the effects of known correlates of death penalty support (e.g., race, sex, political party affiliation, religion) were controlled for in this study. Policy implications are discussed.
James Hubbell, University of South Florida
Jordyn Rad, University of South Florida
Brian D. Godcharles, University of South Florida
John Cochran, University of South Florida
Kathleen Heide, University of South Florida
Eldra P. Solomon, Center for Mental Health