Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Within the routine activity framework, guardians are purported to be defenders against crime. However, very little is known about what motivates residents to monitor their streets and intervene in suspicious or criminal events to prevent property crime. This study builds upon Reynald’s (2010) study with Dutch residents to examine the reasons why Brisbane residents engage or fail to engage in this type of behaviour. The current study utilises data from 20 interviews with Brisbane residents to develop our understanding of this decision making process. Importantly, these interviews show that guardians are a heterogeneous population, which can be split into a number of different typologies. Overall this study shows that opportunity is more important than motivations in guardianship behaviours and that daily routines around the home facilitate supervision.
Emily Moir, Griffith University
Anna Stewart, Griffith University
Danielle Reynald, Griffith University
Timothy C. Hart, Griffith University