Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This article contests the different categorization of intimate partner violence as a crime and terrorism as a national security priority. It contributes to a more direct theoretical contestation and comparison of the priority given to countering public terrorism over private terrorism. While intimate partner homicides in western countries far outweigh deaths from public terrorism, national security priorities identify the threat of public terrorism as more significant than intimate partner violence. Focusing on examples and cases from Australia it analyses contrasting constructions of risk and the priority given to preempting terrorism ahead of countering intimate partner violence. It contends that these differential constructions of risk and the exclusion of intimate violence from the national security agenda reflect and reinforce gendered notions of risk and value.