Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In recent years, two new approaches have bloomed in criminological thinking: narrative criminology and psychosocial criminology. Both have argued for a new consideration of offenders’narratives, based on qualitative and ethnographic research, collocating (or re-collocating) the author of crime at the center of the criminological inquiry. Both approaches confer a much bigger importance than before to the author’s narrative about life events and the reasons for his/her choices, and describe the reality of crime from his/her point of view. The present contribution tries to show the similarities and the differences between them, first looking for concepts that could constitute a “bridge” between the two (e.g. sociological concepts of “account”, or “self-presentation”, and psychodynamic concepts of “self” or “conscious mind”), and subsequently exploring the ways in which both approaches try to go “beyond” what the subject has narrated.