Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper presents preliminary findings from a study conducted during the 2016 Presidential Campaign. Presidential candidates use political rhetoric to garner support from constituents. In the current election, candidates have presented one such appeal by constructing Islam as a “threat” to national security. Donald Trump exemplified an extreme version of this when he suggested banning Muslims from entering the country. Drawing on data gathered from focus groups and qualitative interviews with religious community members in Texas – both Muslim and non-Muslim - we lay out how the rhetoric surrounding the “Islamic threat” has impacted the American imagination. We argue that the criminalization of Muslims can be best understood in contrast to the criminalization of African-Americans. Both result in moral panics that wax and wane, and both have very real impacts on the everyday experiences of the targeted populations. Likewise, both are rooted in socio-historic assumptions about race and ethnicity that aim to constrain minority participation in the democratic process. African-American criminalization stems from the socioeconomic arrangements that followed the end of slavery, while Muslim criminalization stems from the arrangements in the post-Colonialism West. We demonstrate how these racial ideologies influence the fears and assumptions about Muslim-Americans today.