Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Prior research has demonstrated that defendants’ satisfaction with case outcomes and court processing can be predicted by measurements of defendant perceptions of procedural justice (also referred to as procedural fairness). In some studies, perceived fairness was found to be more predictive of defendant satisfaction than disposition or sentence. This study examined defendant perceptions of experiences in criminal court among a sample of gang involved and non-gang involved defendants. Each defendant had a recently closed case in an upstate New York City with an admitted gang problem. City and county officials have employed various enforcement, intervention, and prevention strategies for years in an effort to decrease gang activity, meaning gang members are often known to court actors. Intensive interviews were used to develop an in-depth understanding of how defendants developed perceptions of their court experiences and of which factors most influenced defendant satisfaction with case outcomes and case processing. Results were compared to prior research, most of which has employed close-ended surveys, to explore the use of interviews as a method to increase understanding of the issues of defendant satisfaction and perceptions of procedural justice. The results and conclusions of this study will be discussed, along with policy implications.