Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper re-examines quantitative and qualitative data on girls convicted of violent offenses in England and Wales 2008-13. It explores the quantitative data that arises from practitioners’ who are using an actuarial, risk-based method of assessment. It then critiques those assessments in light of girls’ narrative accounts of, and explanations for, their own behavior. There is a growing body of work that suggests that girls’ accounts for their own behavior are at odds with current criminological theorizing and analysis (Renzetti 1999; Ness 2004 & 2010; Jones 2010; Brown 2010; Carrington 2013; Althoff 2014; Miller et al 2015). I consider girls accounts as resistance to the hegemonic naming of their behavior and ask does this pose unsettling questions for existing theory and practice?