Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Much research on crime prevention tactics perceives specific choices as rational responses to victimization or fear of victimization. In this research, we theorize that individuals may preference specific approaches based on their personal characteristics. Since handguns and weapons are high-risk and high-cost protective solutions, the rational actor perspective implies that individuals will only consider those as a last resort when other options have been attempted and have failed. Alternatively, such solutions may very strongly appeal to those who tend not to consider risk (low self-control) and who have attitudes that are more favorable to violence. Using data from the 2002-3 Seattle Neighborhoods and Crime Survey, we explore the predictors of these preferences using Osgood and Schreck’s (2007) IRT-based model for studying specialization.
Chris Schreck, Rochester Institute of Technology
Bonnie S. Fisher, University of Cincinnati
Pamela Wilcox, University of Cincinnati
Mark Berg, University of Iowa