Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Multiple theories of criminal and/or antisocial behavior highlight the importance of negative emotionality (e.g., Agnew’s general strain theory, DeLisi and Vaughn’s recently introduced temperament theory of antisocial behavior), yet empirical support for the relationship between negative emotionality and offending is inconsistent. Drawing on evidence from personality and psychopathology literature, this paper argues that inconsistency in empirical findings is partially due to imprecise concepts in criminological theories. Advancing our understanding of how emotional traits are implicated in offending depends on the abandonment of the broad concept of negative emotionality and the adoption of a more nuanced understanding of how the co-occurrence of specific emotional traits is related to antisocial and criminal behavior. In line with this argument, this study uses person-centered analysis (latent class analysis) to identify clusters of individuals who vary based on their emotional trait profiles. Linking these profiles to offending behavior will provide further evidence that individuals high on one emotional trait (e.g. fear) are not necessarily high on others (e.g., anger) and emotional traits in isolation do not predict offending as well as specific constellations of emotional traits.