Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
Police integrity has been defined as “the normative inclination among police to resist temptations to abuse the rights and privileges of their occupation” (Klockars, Kutnjak Ivković, & Haberfeld, 2006). The four papers on the panel rely on the theory of police integrity and the accompanying methodology to explore the contours of police integrity in the United States. The papers on the panel partly replicate and extend prior work by exploring the influence of individual, organizational, and/or ecological factors on police officers' perceptions of police misconduct.
Does Discipline Fairness Matter for the Police Code of Silence? Answers from the U.S. Supervisors and Line Officers - Robert Peacock, Michigan State University; Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovich, Michigan State University; Maria Haberfeld, John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Expanding the Measurement of Police Integrity - Zachary Powell, University of Texas at Dallas; Matthew John Hickman, Seattle University; Alex R. Piquero, University of Texas at Dallas; Jack R. Greene, Northeastern University
Police Officer Integrity: Factors Related to Police Supervisors¹ Willingness to Blow the Whistle - Hyeyoung Lim, University of Alabama at Birmingham; John J. Sloan, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Social Bonds, Cognitive Schemas, and Police Deviance: Does the Relative Importance of Specific Bonds Matter in Explaining Police Supervisors’ Workplace Misconduct? - Christopher M. Donner, Loyola University Chicago; Jon Maskaly, University of Texas at Dallas; Lorie Fridell, University of South Florida