Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
Three papers explore the matter of how to provide quality legal representation at the frontiers of the law, policy and research. Shteynberg addresses the new mandate for quality legal representation at the legal frontier of the plea bargain. Anwar et al. address the need to sustain quality legal representation in face of budget dereliction in Louisiana. Beeman addresses the need in research to clarify the meaning and measurement of quality legal representation itself. Ostrom, Lee and Kleiman report the findings of an investigation of defense service delivery under the innovative ‘holistic’ paradigm.
How to Play the Game: Rationales Underlying and Shaping Plea Decision-Making According to Defendants, Defense attorneys, and Prosecutors - Reveka V. Shteynberg, University at Albany, SUNY
Evaluating the Impact the Level of Funding of Indigent Defense Systems has on Defendant Outcomes Using a Natural Experiment in Louisiana - Shamena Anwar, The RAND Corporation
The National Legal Aid & Defender Association Quality Indicators Project - Marea Beeman, National Legal Aid & Defender Association; Claire Buetow, National Legal Aid & Defender Association
Examining the Effectiveness of Holistic Defense in Practice - Brian Ostrom, National Center for State Courts; Cynthia Lee, National Center for State Courts; Matt Kleiman, National Center for State Courts