Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
Nothing in the jurisprudence of the Sixth Amendment stipulates how or when the guarantee of counsel for criminal defendants must be fulfilled. Historic variability in funding for provision of counsel, among other things, has resulted in a patchwork of systems across the nation. Some of these systems impose delays in the appointment of counsel, or incorporate stringent procedures for determining eligibility for assignment that represent barriers between defendants and their lawyers. The papers in this panel present new research on what we know about barriers to access to counsel, and policy innovations in two states which seek to make the process of assignment itself fairer and faster.
Access to Counsel: The Determination of Eligibility for Counsel in Upstate New York - Alyssa Clark, NYS Office of Indigent Legal Services; Andrew L.B. Davies, NYS Indigent Legal Services / SUNY Albany
Local Variation in the Development of Delivery Models for Counsel at First Appearance - Jonah Siegel, Michigan Indigent Defense Commission; Chris Sadler, Michigan Indigent Defense Commission; Jeanette Hussemann, Urban Institute
Court Reform: Why Simple Solutions Might Not Fail? – A Case Study of Implementation of Counsel at First Appearance - Alissa Pollitz Worden, University at Albany, SUNY; Andrew L.B. Davies, NYS Indigent Legal Services / SUNY Albany; Reveka V. Shteynberg, University at Albany, SUNY; Kirstin A. Morgan, University at Albany, SUNY