Perceptions of Procedural Justice among Adults with Recent Criminal Justice Experiences: Final Results

• In Event: Perceptions of Procedural Justice and System Failure, the Role of Gender, Socialization, Identity and Offending

Abstract

Procedural justice is defined by multiple dimensions: voice (individuals can tell their side of the story), respect (being treated with dignity and respect), neutrality (perceiving decision-makers as trustworthy and unbiased), understanding (comprehending their rights and obligations), and helpfulness (believing there is a genuine interest in personal well-being). Though growing research suggests that use of procedural justice principles in criminal justice practices may increase compliance, improve perceptions of fairness, and build legitimacy of criminal justice system, limited research has examined how individuals view multiple justice system experiences from arrest to court to possible incarceration. This paper presents final findings from a mixed methods study on procedural justice in Newark, NJ and Cleveland, OH that focuses on the perceptions of individuals with multiple points of contact with the justice system. Through surveys of 807 adults and in-depth interviews with 102 adults, we present defendant views on fairness and respect in the justice system, as well as their recommendations for criminal justice actors. Final regression analyses and qualitative trends, including any differences in perceptions based on race, gender, and socioeconomic status, will be highlighted. Findings will help criminal justice professionals increase perceptions of fairness and legitimacy, and to build public trust in justice.

Authors

• Josephine Hahn, Center for Court Innovation

• Cassandra Ramdath, Center for Court Innovation