Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Previous research has suggested that the general public is supportive of sex offender management policies, such as residence restrictions, and that this support persists even when presented with research that suggests these policies are not effective. We utilize a factorial survey experiment and a nationally representative sample (N ~ 1,000) to examine the relationship between support for residence restrictions, and 1) the type of research findings (i.e., lack of public safety effects vs. collateral consequences), and 2) the manner in which those findings are presented (i.e., anecdotal vs. scientific). Implications for practice and research will be discussed.
Jason Rydberg, University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Kelly M Socia, University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Christopher P Dum, Kent State University