Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Since the late 1980s, a significant amount of research has been devoted towards understanding women’s distinct pathways to involvement in the criminal justice system. However, the majority of this research has analyzed pathways using a general gendered framework that has not accounted for racial distinctions. More recently, feminist criminologists have called for attention towards understanding variation within gender, or experiences at the intersections between gender and race. As a few studies qualitatively examined the experiences of women of Color, we seek to expand upon this literature through a quantitative assessment of their pathways to justice-involvement. The current study uses a path analytic approach to examine how applicable the three gender-specific path models developed by Salisbury and Van Voorhis (2009) account for the experiences of Black women (n = 88). We found that while Black women had similar gender-responsive risk factors, the indirect effects varied from the findings of Salisbury and Van Voorhis (2009). Theoretical and policy implications are also discussed.
Breanna Boppre, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Emily Salisbury, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Patricia Van Voorhis, University of Cincinnati