Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Abstract:We examined the structure of ideological reasoning in a large corpus (1.8 million words) of written exchanges in a popular Ku Klax Klan online forum, covering political events between 2010-2014. A standardized procedure for extraction of ideological components (IELEX; Cohen et al., 2016) was used to characterize the ideology of the writers. The 2-step procedure proved efficient and sensitive in characterizing grievance-based violent ideologies. In the first step, a computational algorithm identified keywords that express absolute, fanatic and overgeneralized sentiments. In the second step, a random sample of sentences containing these words was content-analyzed for their particular ideological sub-argument by a group of 3 trained raters. Unlike most other politically violent ideologies , the KKK exchanges were notably non-specific as regards to: 1) The exact identity of their designated enemy (e.g. ’they’ was used far more than ‘blacks’, ‘immigrants’, etc.); and 2) The actions advocated to address ‘white suppression’ and its inevitably disastrous consequences. Thus, implicit calls for violent action were far more frequent than explicit ones. Along with evidence for self-censorship and disclosure aversion, the presumed function of this indirect form of ideological sedition in actual far right hate crimes will be discussed.
Shuki Cohen, The Graduate Center, John Jay College / CUNY
Joshua D. Freilich, The Graduate Center, John Jay College / CUNY
Tom Holt, Michigan State University
Steven M. Chermak, Michigan State University