Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Objectives: Although previous studies have examined whether the presence of voluntary organizations impact neighborhood crime rates, voluntary organizations’ differential capacity to affect crime has been virtually unaccounted for. This study examines the independent effects that the number of voluntary organizations and the total amount of income they possess have on neighborhood crime, over time. Methods: Drawing upon a unique dataset of Los Angeles census blocks from 2000 to 2010, I utilize fixed-effects negative binomial regression to estimate a series of crime models. Results: The number of voluntary organizations and the total amount of income they possess in the focal block, respectively, have no statistical influence on most crime types the following year. Yet, both aspects of voluntary organizations exhibit crime-reducing influences when accounting for their broader spatial impact (within a ½ mile radius of the focal block), and controlling for numerous factors that have been shown to be associated with crime rates. Conclusions: For the number of voluntary organizations, this suggests that increasing the opportunities for residents to utilize organizations can reduce crime in neighborhoods. For the income of voluntary organizations, it appears that increasing organizations’ capacity to reduce crime can translate to lower crime in neighborhoods as well.