Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The goal of this manuscript is to renew the discussion of specialization as a dynamic process. We argue that astute critiques of the role of sequence in the early specialization literature (Miethe et al 2006; Osgood and Schreck 2007, Sullivan et al 2006) resulted in a reconceptualization of criminal specialization as a static characteristic. Our objective is to advance the conceptual and theoretical development of criminal specialization by re-introducing the notion of “sequence’ into the conceptualization of specialization. In this paper, we examine whether the process that generates specialization has memory. A finding that the process that generates specialization has memory suggests that criminal specialization is not just a static feature that can be used to describe a criminal career holistically, but rather a dynamic feature of a criminal career that develops over time. Modeling specialization as a Markov process, we show strong evidence that specialization is a dynamic process and that sequence is a relevant specialization parameter.
Sarah Tahamont, University of Maryland
Kyle Thomas, University of Missouri-St. Louis
Thomas Loughran, University of Maryland