The Hindering of Biosocial Criminology in Modern Academia

• In Event: Contemporary Issues in Biosocial Criminology

Abstract

Traditional criminological theories focus primarily on social settings when examining crime and analogous behavior. However, the social factors only tell a part of the story. While the social setting is undoubtedly important to focus on, human biology, we argue, is equally important to take into consideration when discussing antisocial outcomes. Wright et al. (2008) conducted a study which indicated a need for increased focus on biosocial research as a relevant avenue for expansion in criminology. They found Ph.D students in criminology and criminal justice are afforded few opportunities to learn about biosocial criminology. This study builds on those findings to determine how much has changed in the field of criminology and criminal justice in just under a decade. Some scholars argue that biosocial criminology is growing “exponentially.” This paper intends to find out if they are correct in their statement, and if the suggestions of Wright et al. (2008) have been heeded. Recommendations for the theoretical and practical advancement of criminology and criminal justice will be discussed.

Authors

• Matthias Woeckener, Sam Houston State University

• Danielle Boisvert, Sam Houston State University