Use of Research Evidence in Criminal Justice Policy and Practice

• In Event: Roundtable: Linking Criminological Research to Policy and Practice

Abstract

This paper examines the under-utilization of research evidence in criminal justice policy, programs, and practice. Despite the recognized value of evidence-based interventions, a large gap between research and policy and practice persists. Drawing upon relevant literature, this paper offers explanations for this gap, ways to increase use of research, and suggestions for additional research. Beyond the realization that academicians and policymakers work in different “communities” that impede mutual understanding and collaboration, other causes of the gap include problems with the research itself (e.g. methodological flaws or limited generalizability) and problems with policymaking and practice (e.g. political pressure, special interest bias, and improper implementation). Solutions include bridging the gap between research and practice by increasing communication and collaboration among academicians, public policy researchers and evaluators, policymakers, and practitioners. Facilitating effective partnerships, making research accessible, and utilizing third party policy and research firms as mediators, are possible options for change. Lastly, use of research is a very under-studied topic, and the barriers to applying research are not well understood. Particularly needed are studies examining the research utilization experiences of front line decision-makers such as program directors, coordinators and heads of smaller agencies.

Authors

• Lee M Johnson, William Paterson University of New Jersey

• Susan M Lebold, Wayne State University

• Paul Elam, Public Policy Associates

• Robert Burroughs, Public Policy Associates, Inc.