Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Much of the existing courts literature has focused on examining whether racial, gender, and family status disparity exists for defendants across various decision points. There is limited research on decision-making post sentencing (i.e. probation review hearings, revocation hearings). Further, the literature on case processing in problem-solving courts other than drug courts is small. Given the increased discretion in problem-solving courts and at areas post sentencing, an examination of whether disparity exists across social location (i.e. gender, race/ethnicity) is warranted. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of probationer race/ethnicity, gender, employment status, and family status on judges’ decision to sanction for non-compliance with the condition of probation. A sample of probation review hearings from a large Midwestern county were selected for participant observation and further data collection. Results and implications will be presented.