Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
In recent years, criminological studies have vacillated between two positions on terrorism. Those that treat terrorism as crime consider forces such as strain and disenfranchisement to explain the process by which young men and women engage in terrorism. Those that insist on ideological commitment as the defining feature of terrorism banish the terrorist to a strange space outside the realm of social science. The ways in which terrorism is understood also have serious policy implications. If the radical ideology of terrorists places them beyond reason, then military engagement with terrorist groups appears as the only practical response. But, if terrorism is a crime which despite its unique features, can still be “figured out” criminologically, then proactive non-military interventions can be conceived. In this panel, we will discuss theoretical takes on terrorism ranging from control theory to strain theory and cultural criminological theories, while critically engaging with state policy responses, such as sting operations, to preempt terrorist activities.
‘We Are So Miserable Here, You Know?’: Security, Burkini, Social Cohesion - Ilgin Yorukoglu, Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York
Generalists or Specialists? A Comparison of Domestic Violence Across Ideologically Motivated Offenders in the United States - Joshua D. Freilich, The Graduate Center, John Jay College / CUNY; Steven M. Chermak, Michigan State University; Brittany E. Hayes, Sam Houston State University; Tri Keah Henry, Sam Houston State University
FBI Stings Against Suspected Terrorists: “Kramer Jihadists” Versus the “Known Wolf” of Orlando - Mark S. Hamm, Indiana State University