Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
Areas of discussion will include: When Mitigation Becomes Aggravation: The Danger of Over-Reliance on Scientific Evidence in Sex Offender Sentencing Hearings; The General Acceptability of Diagnoses Used in Sex Offender Civil Commitment Cases; “The Strings in the Books Ain’t Pulled and Persuaded”: How the Use of Improper Statistics and Unverified Data Corrupts the Judicial Process in Sex Offender Cases; and Second generation litigation challenging sex offender laws: developing a strategic approach.
“The Strings in the Books Ain’t Pulled and Persuaded”: How the Use of Improper Statistics and Unverified Data Corrupts the Judicial Process in Sex Offender Cases - Heather Cucolo, New York Law School; Michael Louis Perlin, New York Law School; Mental Disability Law & Policy Associates
The General Acceptability of Diagnoses Used in Sex Offender Civil Commitment Cases - Naomi M. Weinstein, Mental Hygiene Legal Service
When Mitigation Becomes Aggravation: The Danger of Over-Reliance on Scientific Evidence in Sex Offender Sentencing Hearings - Alison J. Lynch, Disability Rights New York
Second Generation Litigation Challenging Sex Offender Laws: Developing a Strategic Approach - Eric Janus, Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Eric Janus, Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Alison J. Lynch, Disability Rights New York
Michael Louis Perlin, New York Law School; Mental Disability Law & Policy Associates
Naomi M. Weinstein, Mental Hygiene Legal Service