Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Roundtable Session
Nonwhite offenders are incarcerated at much higher rates than white offenders, and much of this disproportionality results from sentence enhancements based on offender prior record. An offender’s prior record is a major sentencing factor in all American jurisdictions, and is an especially strong factor (or at least, much more visible) in sentencing guidelines jurisdictions – offenders with higher criminal history scores are more likely to be recommended for, and more likely to receive, executed-prison sentences and longer prison terms. Since nonwhite offenders tend to have higher criminal history scores, these sentence enhancements have a very substantial disparate impact, greatly contributing to the problem of disproportionate minority confinement. A number of states, with and without guidelines, have sought to address disparity problems by making racial/ethnic impact assessments, using the same prison-bed impact methodology that is used to assess the fiscal impacts of existing and proposed sentencing rules. Sometimes these racial/ethnic impact assessments result in policy changes, but their use remains controversial – when and to what extent should sentencing policy be changed in light of predicted disparate impact? The purpose of this roundtable is to promote discussion of these issues by researchers who have studied racial disparities in sentencing.
Rhys Hester, Penn State Univ & PA Commission on Sentencing
Marc Mauer, The Sentencing Project
Kevin R. Reitz, University of Minnesota Law; Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Julian V. Roberts, Oxford University
Cassia Spohn, Arizona State University
Michael Tonry, University of Minnesota
Jeffery T. Ulmer, Penn State University