Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this paper is to explore trends in the media’s coverage of alleged false rape accusations over time. Research estimates the prevalence of false reports of rape and/or sexual assault is between 2 and 10 percent. Nevertheless, it is still a commonly held belief that women lie about rape and sexual assault. Consistent with the backlash argument, we hypothesize that news coverage of alleged false rape accusations will increase in proportion to women’s gains in equality with men. Furthermore, we use an inductive approach to explore how reported victim-, perpetrator-, and incident-related characteristics may drive news coverage of alleged false rape accusations. To examine these trends and characteristics, the current study performs a content analysis of newspaper articles published in The New York Times between 1950 and 2010 that reported on instances of rape and sexual assault.
Dixie Rocker, Florida State University
Jennifer M. Brown, Florida State University
Ashley Rubin, University of Toronto
Ted Chiricos, Florida State University