Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Juvenile justice agencies across the United States have implemented risk and needs assessment tools, but there are gaps in understanding how those scores are used in order to improve case outcomes. In theory, the assessment is intended to inform the system’s intervention strategy, improving effectiveness in reducing recidivism. Still, relatively little research has examined whether these theorized processes hold in practice. Using data from a larger study, we examine the association between identified needs and risks from the Ohio Youth Assessment System (OYAS) disposition tool, specifically substance use and mental health indicators. We also measure services received, and case dispositions. Case records were drawn from randomly selected counties and cases in two states. The analysis focuses on two main objectives: (a) examines indicators of substance use and mental health problems based on an assessment and (b) links that to the services received. The discussion will focus on the implications of general risk and needs assessment for success in treating mental health and substance use problems in justice-involved youths.
Holly Lonergan, University of Cincinnati
Derek John Mueller, University of Cincinnati
Catherine Strange, University of Cincinnati
Christopher Sullivan, University of Cincinnati