Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This decade has seen a proliferation of research on how to measure the Sutherland-inspired construct of differential association with delinquent peers. While this research has highlighted the extent to which there are conceptual, statistical, and theoretical problems with perceptual measures of peer deviance, this set of research has collectively fallen short of being able to definitely provide a ‘yes or no’ answer to whether perceptions of peer deviance are suitable indicators of differential association. Using dyadic data, this project proposes a new analytical technique to more closely align prior findings with theory in an attempt to move closer towards a ‘yes or no’ answer as to whether peer deviance perceptions are valid. Findings are discussed in the context of prior research as well as self-control and social learning theories. We conclude by discussing how our technique can be used in future research to push towards a ‘yes or no’ answer regarding the validity of peer deviance measures.
John H. Boman, Bowling Green State University
Thomas Mowen, Bowling Green State University
John M. Eassey, Missouri State University