Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Misdemeanors account for the vast majority of criminal cases each year, upwards of 80% of criminal caseloads in some states (Court Statistics Project, 2016). Further, in the United States approximately 97% of criminal cases (felony and misdemeanor) are resolved through guilty pleas (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2010). Despite the prevalence of misdemeanor pleas in the United States, however, little attention has been paid to the validity of these pleas. The validity of guilty pleas is often concerned with three main factors: (1) knowingness and intelligence of the decision, (2) voluntariness of entering the plea, and (3) factual guilt (Redlich, 2016). The court traditionally evaluates the validity of guilty pleas through oral judicial plea colloquies during plea hearings and written tender-of-plea forms. This presentation will provide new data obtained from systematic observations of plea hearings and interviews with defendants. Observational and interview data of misdemeanor and felony pleas will be analyzed and compared, focusing on the three main factors of plea validity. The presentation will conclude with research and policy implications for misdemeanor pleas.
Amy Dezember, George Mason University
Samantha Luna, George Mason University
Melissa Manley, George Mason University
Megan Stoltz, George Mason University
Allison D. Redlich, George Mason University