Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
ASC Home
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
This thematic panel explores the different dimensions of the decision-making process for parole for juvenile lifers. Following the decisions in Miller v. Alabama (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016), several states have changed their legal landscape on parole. The papers on this panel explore three aspects: the role of offense seriousness; criteria and processes of eligibility of parole, specifically as they relate to evidence of maturity and rehabilitation and the factors that affect the decision to grant or deny parole.
Making Sense of Offense Seriousness: Why Offense Severity Matters in the Context of a Juvenile Lifer’s Parole Board Hearing - Simon Singer, Northeastern University; Stuti Subbaiah Kokkalera, Northeastern University
Criteria and Processes for Review of Release Eligibility of Children Sentenced to Life without Possibility of Parole - Perry Moriearty, University of Minnesota Law School; Michael Tonry, University of Minnesota Law School
A Stone of Hope: Empirical Analysis and Reform Proposal for Youth Offender Parole Decisions - Kristen Bell, University of Oregon School of Law