Institutional Anomie Theory and Cybercrime: An International Comparison using Data from Finland, Hungary, and the US

• In Event: Comparative Studies of Anomie

Abstract

Research on cybercrime is beginning to test a myriad of traditional criminological theories. Theories such as routine activities, self-control and general strain are showing promise in explaining online deviance. Despite evidence for violent crimes (e.g., homicide), institutional anomie theory (IAT) is rarely tested in cyberspace. We seek to remedy this by examining IAT through an international comparison. In 2022 three surveys were conducted using participants from Finland, Hungary, and The United States. We compared self-reported rates of online offending with IAT measures. Cybercrimes included a range of deviance such as online bullying, illegal downloading, illegal drug purchases, and hacking. We present the results, highlighting the applicability of IAT in cyberspace.

Authors

• Tunde Barabas, National University of Public Service, Hungary

• Thomas Dearden, Virginia Tech

• James Hawdon, Virginia Tech

• Tibor Kiss, National University of Public Service, Hungary

• Aki Koivula, University of Turku, Finland

• Katalin Parti, Virginia Tech

• Pekka Räsänen, University of Turku, Finland

• Akos Szigeti, National University of Public Service, Hungary