Mixed Methods for Evaluating Reentry Programs: Findings from Qualitative Research in a Process Evaluation

• In Event: Innovations in Reentry: Problem-Identification, Program Delivery, and Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of a Second Chance Act grant-funded reentry project to provide feedback on program implementation, conduct quality assurance, identify barriers and challenges, identify successes, and produce recommendations for program improvement. The primary research problem focused on the difficulties of delivering reentry programming to high-risk individuals in residential and work-release facilities. Research methods adopted included interviews of program participants, programming observations, and focus groups of program staff and relevant stakeholders. Major findings included: 1) staff faced challenges in motivating program attendance and participant engagement, 2) staff were properly credentialed and received appropriate training to complete their responsibilities, 3) stakeholders were helpful participant recruitment, but requested more communication with program staff, 4) stakeholders were sources of information on specific challenges faced by participants, 5) participants described successes in their reentry process, but identified numerous challenged to reentry, and 6) participants expressed appreciation for reentry programs, but indicated a need for additional programming and opportunities for successful desistance. Process evaluation findings were delivered to program staff so that innovations and modifications could be made at early stages of the project to improve the process and outcomes of the program.

Authors

• Ryan Spohn, University of Nebraska at Omaha

• Michael F. Campagna, University of Nebraska at Omaha