Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Objective: Romance scam has been previously assessed from the framework of restrictive deterrence theory. However, little is known about the effect of reward in changing fraudsters’ behaviors. To explore, an important source of how offenders strategically change their behaviors is through conducting experiments and holding conversations with them.
Data/Methods: Data was obtained through collecting responses from fraudsters to four experimental e-mails. A total of 94 transcripts and responses were collected, analyzed, coded, recoded and reanalyzed using inductive quantitative and qualitative analytic methods.
Results: Finding suggest fraudsters use more words in their immediate responses to email 4 after we send reward. The following qualitative analysis reveals seven main themes through coding fraudsters’ responses. Following this, we again code these seven main themes into quantitative variables across different emails. The result demonstrates certain variability.
Conclusion/Implications: Romance fraud results in losses among many individuals and families. These findings provide further evidence to the romance scam literature by discovering fraudsters’ manipulation of rewards of victims’ behaviors. These observations can be used to guide preventative romance scam efforts and mitigate its harm more promptly.