Exclusion, Opportunity Knowledge Gaps, or Purposeful Avoidance? Exploring System Avoidance Experiences and Strategies Among Formerly Incarcerated Adults

• In Event: Navigating Mainstream Institutions and Non-Traditional Alternatives Post-Incarceration

Abstract

Prior research indicates that formerly incarcerated individuals are more likely than non-system involved people to engage in “system avoidance,” or strategically avoiding contact with institutions that are perceived to be intrusive and surveilling. In addition to the negative consequences of structural exclusion, the choice to avoid mainstream institutions can also contribute to post-release reintegration challenges. This paper analyzes extensive interview data on how people perceive, interact with, and make decisions to engage with four types of non-criminal justice institutions: medical, financial, employment, and political. We examine which institutions our study participants identify as potentially exchanging their personal data or having surveillance features, along with reported benefits and consequences of system avoidance. By comparing undesired exclusion, knowledge gaps in available opportunities, and purposeful system avoidance, we aim to contribute to broader policy discussions about successful reintegration initiatives.

Authors

• Megan Denver, Northeastern University

• Rodney K. Brunson, University of Maryland

• Oscar Navarro-Alvarez, Northeastern University