Integrating Community Engagement in Prosecutorial Research: A Non-Traditional Partnership

• In Event: International and Community Perspectives on Prosecutorial Decisions

Abstract

Problem: Criminal justice research is traditionally led by researchers with support from justice agencies, meaning the interests of community members most affected by the justice system may be overlooked. In a study of prosecutorial decision-making, we are working to integrate community engagement in a non-traditional research partnership involving a coalition of researchers, prosecutors, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) Monroe County Branch. Context: The project purpose is to explore prosecutorial discretion at several decision-making stages for traffic and misdemeanor cases in two Indiana counties. The study will document racial and ethnic disparities and assess local diversion programs. One central goal is to integrate community engagement throughout the process, so the study is reflective of community interests, particularly the interests of community members most impacted by the justice system. Challenges: In the project’s first year, our community-researcher-practitioner team has faced difficulties in facilitating effective communication across partners and in achieving meaningful community engagement. Conclusion: To address these challenges, we have learned to engage in in-person relationship building activities across partners, to rely on smaller decision-making workgroups, and to draw on our community partner’s networking ties with other local organizations to better facilitate meaningful community engagement.

Authors

• Carmen Diaz, Indiana University Bloomington

• Tri Keah Henry, Indiana University

• Eric Grommon, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis

• Evan Lowder, George Mason University

• Maqubè Reese, President NAACP Monroe County Branch

• Marshall Allen, Indiana University Bloomington

• Erika Oliphant, Prosecuting Attorney, Monroe County Prosecutor’s Office